There are lots of decisions to make when it comes to divorce. Some couples choose to work out differences on their own, which allows them to settle out of court. Others cannot see eye to eye on major issues involving kids or property, so their cases must go before a judge so decisions can be made on their behalf.
As explained by Forbes, there are pros and cons for each option. Here are a few of them so you can make the best decision regarding your divorce and other related issues.
Trials are beneficial when dealing with a difficult spouse
You will only be able to work through challenging negotiations if your former spouse is willing to be reasonable. If there is a lot of resentment about your split or your ex-partner’s views are wildly divergent from yours, you may stand a better chance of winning at trial. For example, if your ex is denying shared custody for invalid reasons, the judge is likely to aware joint custody in the best interest of your child.
Settling usually takes less time
If your spouse is reasonable and willing to work with you on negotiations, settling might be the better option. This is especially true if you want the process to be wrapped up quickly, as court cases usually take longer to resolve. They also take more of your time, as you will need to prepare evidence for your trial.
Both options can be stressful
There is no stress-free divorce option. Even if you and your ex-spouse can come to an amicable resolution, you will still experience some stress and anxiety when making decisions. After all, ending a marriage is an emotional experience for everyone, and you want to make decisions in the best interest of you and your family. While trials also entail stress, it can be reassuring to have professional legal assistance to support you during your case.